Week 5 Blog Virtual
Teaching and Learning
Essential Question:
How do instructional design stages help us understand online teaching?
The ADDIE
instructional course design model helps a designer to create a course that is
efficient for the students and instructors involved. ADDIE stands for the
stages that must be taken to create thus course and the stages are analysis,
design, develop, implement, and evaluate. Most instructional design models are
structured like the ADDIE model and this is because it works. Instructional
design can be done alone (not suggested), in an author-editor model, or in a
course team model. Moore and Kearsley explains the pros and cons of each model.
They explain that “the author-editor model is a great deal cheaper than a
course team, and it results in relatively quick development and modification of
courses.” Also that, “The greater wealth of knowledge and experience in the
course team results in course materials that are superior” but the model is
much more expensive and requires lots of time to develop. (2012)
While
looking at MOOCs (Massive Online Open Courses), Anders brings up some valid
points how the design of the courses need to be a hybrid course between the
following main models of content-based and network-based. The effective hybrid
course is community and task-based that has guided, social learning activities.
(2015) For example, “If you only do one thing…” is an assignment that helps
focus and streamline activities for engaging and promoting learning for the
students. Hybrid MOOCs also promote many educational methods to adhere to all
types of learning styles for students to feel connected to the community of
learning. Anders summarizes hybrid MOOCs as “supportive environments in which
participants develop the experience and confidence necessary to be successful
in more open and distributed learning contexts.” (2015)
To help
discover and analyze what designs are best for student growth and learning, I
have taken a look at research about the weaknesses of courses that are from a
box so that I know not to apply this to my future courses. In this article we
see that courses that weren’t made by the instructor or the instructor was not a
part of the designing were ineffective. (2015, Course) Teachers felt like they
could not change the course even by a little bit to benefit the students’
learning styles and even the teachers’ teaching styles. This brings a very
obvious point that can be looked over out of ease. If a course is pre-made,
give the instructor full reign on changing the course to support the students
and create collaborative learning environments.
Anders, A. (2015). Theories and Applications of Massive
Online Open Courses (MOOCs): The Case for Hybrid Design.International Review
Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39-61.
The Course-in-a-box Design Issues. (2015). TechTrends:
Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 59(4),
71-77.
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance Education:
A system view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Mariah, You touched on the most important aspect in the teacher toolbox and that is the ability to manipulate the curriculum, or the materials, or the method for the benefit of the students' individual needs. I can't imagine simply signing on as the teacher of record and not having the control of malleability. Good comments.
ReplyDeleteMariah, the above comment was posted by Dan.
Delete